TO DESTROY THE HISTORY
There is one fundamental difference between the right and the left. As for the first - they tend to go straight to the stated goal (even if it is inappropriate), while the second ones never express their original plans, they gradually open them over time (the left don`t have the habit to declare own true goals in their political programs).
This can be clearly illustrated by the example of the Third Reich, the NSDAP and some of their promises, by which they spoiled own reputation in Europe: they promised persecution of the Jews and they had been doing this after gaining the power. Could they do it secretly all over the controlled territoryes? Of cource they could. So why they gave such deliberate publicity to their actions? Apparently, the leftists' methods do not fit into the principles of the right. They promised to fight Bolshevism - and they had fought. As far as possible, they allow themselves to conclude temporary alliances with some states - and they had concluded. But let's return to the topic.
Today's situation in the US demonstrates the typical left-wing methodology to the fullest. Starting with ridiculous attempts to reduce the number of significant authors in the eduation program - in particular it refers to Shakespeare, Plato, Aristotle, etc. - and ending with real actions, such as the demolition of monuments to the Confederates and much, much more.
Looking at the right, in general, you understand what the movement is striving for. At the same time, listening what the lefts say, everything seems quite good and fair on the first glance: everyone are happy and equal, everithing goes well, no one is oppressed. Total triumph of justice. But then, year after year, the situation begins to clear up: First comes labeling (this is a dominant class, and therefore those are oppressed ones), then compulsion (entrepreneurs, educational institutions, ministries, etc.), then they run quotas on "acceptable clases" (and call it positive discrimination, not privilege; "there is definitely no need to make the word "privilege" too conspicuous, we are building equality here, aren't we?). After that they displace any dissent and build their own cultural space (they throw out and turn over classical forms of art, literature, etc.) to proclaim in the result own unbreakable norms of morality, and so on and so forth. We offer you to read about the three waves of feminism and other phenomenas of that kind, if interested.
To the point. Now the wave of "deconfederation" reaches its extreme forms. And now we can define what Soros was aiming for, when the facts of his involvement to the situation in Charlottesville has has come to light. After the recent demolition of the monument to Robert Lee, Chicago-based African-American bishop James Duke, called the mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, to rename the park named after the nation's father George Washington. Dykes says that it's time to demolish the statues of all American presidents (who were slave owners) in African American neighborhoods, and it seems to be a clear hint to autonomic ambitions. He also said that the name of President Andrew Jackson should be removed from the neighboring Jackson Park. In the meantime, some governors - in particular Roy Cooper of the US Democtaric Party - are urging protesters to demolish all the monuments to the Confederates on their own.
Angela Rai - a lawyer and political commentator for CNN - called to remove all the monuments to George Washington. Clearly, that such an example of passionate enmity toward historcal personalities-contributors to a nation building just couldn't avoid the simpathy from left-wing radicals. As it became known, the second monument to Abraham Lincoln has already been damaged in few days in the US. Further, apparently, there will come proposals to rename the capital. It seems that the left-liberalism is about to put its nimble hands into the American history. Quite expectable that the left will show their will in everything, even despite all these "people's will" talks. The PBS NewsHour poll showed that 62% of Americans stand for preserving the Confederation monuments, 11% abstained, and only 27% supported the demolition idea.
To the point. Now the wave of "deconfederation" reaches its extreme forms. And now we can define what Soros was aiming for, when the facts of his involvement to the situation in Charlottesville has has come to light. After the recent demolition of the monument to Robert Lee, Chicago-based African-American bishop James Duke, called the mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, to rename the park named after the nation's father George Washington. Dykes says that it's time to demolish the statues of all American presidents (who were slave owners) in African American neighborhoods, and it seems to be a clear hint to autonomic ambitions. He also said that the name of President Andrew Jackson should be removed from the neighboring Jackson Park. In the meantime, some governors - in particular Roy Cooper of the US Democtaric Party - are urging protesters to demolish all the monuments to the Confederates on their own.
Angela Rai - a lawyer and political commentator for CNN - called to remove all the monuments to George Washington. Clearly, that such an example of passionate enmity toward historcal personalities-contributors to a nation building just couldn't avoid the simpathy from left-wing radicals. As it became known, the second monument to Abraham Lincoln has already been damaged in few days in the US. Further, apparently, there will come proposals to rename the capital. It seems that the left-liberalism is about to put its nimble hands into the American history. Quite expectable that the left will show their will in everything, even despite all these "people's will" talks. The PBS NewsHour poll showed that 62% of Americans stand for preserving the Confederation monuments, 11% abstained, and only 27% supported the demolition idea.
original by Diorama
Коментарі
Дописати коментар