DO NOT REPEAT THE SAME MISTAKE AGAIN
Historically, being located between two threats Ukrainian people often have to make one and the same choice. And, unfortunately, like a naive child almost always we chose a worse side. First, "Ukrainian" journalist of non-Ukrainian origin Mustafa Nayem called people to gather at the Independence Square and hold pro-EU action, then more than 100 Ukrainian patriots died in battles with Berkut for independent Ukrainian state, but in result we see same anti-national government.
The "Moscow" factor - silent occupation of Ukraine by Moscow in all spheres from economic (capturing and further destruction of the Ukrainian strategic enterprises) to cultural (massive pressing of Ukrainian language and culture in all spheres) was a significant reason for Ukrainian nationalists to join the Maidan events, during which they attempted to direct the social protest towards the nation-liberation struggle for gaining of independent and national state.
At the same time some Ukrainians have really believed that the EU integration is the only way to save their country, which had almost been swallowed by the Kremlin's Eurasianism globalist project; however, during this two years they impose us the Minsk protocols and other forms of agreements with the Kremlin-backed terrorists; meanwhile Ukraine has lost its three regions, and, what is much worse, about ten thousand of its best sons, who were forced to leave their revolutionary struggle in Kyiv (and literally gave avay the country to people, against whom we rise in winter of 2013) and go to defend the country in the steppes of Donbass.
However, in recent time we have heard a lot of negative messages from Washington towards the proteges in Kyiv. In general, we can divide the post-Maidan authorities on two types: representative of "local" corrupt oligarchy and so-called representatives of the West.
The first category includes people like Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk of Timoshenko, we conditionally call them "locals"; the second category - "foreginers," consists of so-called reformers (Saakashvily, Yaresko, etc.) supported by the US embassy, and all kind of liberal politicians or public activists like Nayem or Leschenko - supported by international capital and grants, who promote "progressive" cultural marxist ideas.
It is obvious, that "local" politicians fell short of expectations of representatives of international capital. Well, for some reason these hucksters don't hurry to sale Ukrainian land, universities, etc; yes, they have launched new wave of privatisation, but did it in their own interests; and what about so-called "European values?" They failed to secure holding of LGBT festival in Lviv. And if the people's outrage on "Moscow" factor has been cunningly used some forces to redirect some part of social protest from pro-Ukrainian to pro-EU vector, now (when we see serious preconditions to new anti-government protests caused by such problems as "corruption and lack of reforms") they will undoubtedly try repeat the trick.
It is clear that both "Moscow" and "Corruption" are real threats for Ukraine. But, for some reason, all people, who were really ready to fight corruption in the country (and especially FOR the country) have been removed from Ukrainian policy or replaced by "professional corruption fighters," who have some relation to various "foundations," founded by transnational capital. And whose final goal in political area is to transfer political power directly to the faithful of transnational capital and to ensure unhindered sale of all available in new colony resources (which, of course, still not belong to their colleagues from Russia). Regarding their goals in cultural area - it's the destruction of the Ukrainian fundamental traditions, that's why most part of these "progressive" politicians are advocating gender and multiculturalism.
And speaking about some new revolutionary struggle we have to understand that neither LGBT activists, nor other leftist liberals aren't able to storm the barricades or fight with regime defenders, but nationalists are. And if people like Nayem or Saakashvili will be present in a new revolutionary command, then we have to understand, that they will gladly join new parliament while nationalists will be defending the country from new invasion from the east. And in this case somewhere between frontline reports from volunteer battalions we will read about Nayem's speech in the parliament, during which he will talk about the benefits of Monsanto's GMO food products planted in the Ukrainian fields.
It is clear that every "activist," whose face we saw before in photos with Soros or Payet as well as with the Kremlin's oligarchs, is a priori not a defender of the interests of Ukrainian nation. We have no right to do the same mistake again!
The first category includes people like Poroshenko, Yatsenyuk of Timoshenko, we conditionally call them "locals"; the second category - "foreginers," consists of so-called reformers (Saakashvily, Yaresko, etc.) supported by the US embassy, and all kind of liberal politicians or public activists like Nayem or Leschenko - supported by international capital and grants, who promote "progressive" cultural marxist ideas.
It is obvious, that "local" politicians fell short of expectations of representatives of international capital. Well, for some reason these hucksters don't hurry to sale Ukrainian land, universities, etc; yes, they have launched new wave of privatisation, but did it in their own interests; and what about so-called "European values?" They failed to secure holding of LGBT festival in Lviv. And if the people's outrage on "Moscow" factor has been cunningly used some forces to redirect some part of social protest from pro-Ukrainian to pro-EU vector, now (when we see serious preconditions to new anti-government protests caused by such problems as "corruption and lack of reforms") they will undoubtedly try repeat the trick.
It is clear that both "Moscow" and "Corruption" are real threats for Ukraine. But, for some reason, all people, who were really ready to fight corruption in the country (and especially FOR the country) have been removed from Ukrainian policy or replaced by "professional corruption fighters," who have some relation to various "foundations," founded by transnational capital. And whose final goal in political area is to transfer political power directly to the faithful of transnational capital and to ensure unhindered sale of all available in new colony resources (which, of course, still not belong to their colleagues from Russia). Regarding their goals in cultural area - it's the destruction of the Ukrainian fundamental traditions, that's why most part of these "progressive" politicians are advocating gender and multiculturalism.
And speaking about some new revolutionary struggle we have to understand that neither LGBT activists, nor other leftist liberals aren't able to storm the barricades or fight with regime defenders, but nationalists are. And if people like Nayem or Saakashvili will be present in a new revolutionary command, then we have to understand, that they will gladly join new parliament while nationalists will be defending the country from new invasion from the east. And in this case somewhere between frontline reports from volunteer battalions we will read about Nayem's speech in the parliament, during which he will talk about the benefits of Monsanto's GMO food products planted in the Ukrainian fields.
It is clear that every "activist," whose face we saw before in photos with Soros or Payet as well as with the Kremlin's oligarchs, is a priori not a defender of the interests of Ukrainian nation. We have no right to do the same mistake again!
By the materials of Zentropa Ukraine
Коментарі
Дописати коментар