Igor Zahrebelny attitude to the Islamist attack on «Charlie Hebdo»
Igor Zahrebelny attitude to the Islamist attack on «Charlie Hebdo»
"Muslims is an example for Europeans how to protect native traditions" - Igor Zagrebelny
Shooting occurred at the «Charlie Hebdo» office at wednesday. Before the attack the magazine's last tweet was a cartoon of the Islamic State leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. The magazine was attacked in November 2012 a day after it featured a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad.
Two men, armed with automatic guns start shoot, according to newspaper. Nine people were killed inside the building and two police officers - outside, according to updated information.
Eight employees of magazine and one policeman was killed in office.
Paris Municipality also reported about six injured people, including one policeman. The attackers come and escape from the place of incident by the same car.
Zahrebelny considers that the attackers were the Salafists. At the same time analyst consider this caricature of Prophet in 2012 as a mistake or a deliberate provocation: "I completely understand the anti-Islamic sentiment of many Europeans. But you need to fight against Islamization of Europe, not against islam. Against the phenomenon of migration first of all. It`s quite bad idea to declare ourselves the enemy of Islam. It can be beneficial to a third party - not Christians, not Muslims. We must differentiate between Islam as a religion, Islamic nations on the one side and Islamisation of Europe on the other.
The point of no return have passed in the most of European countries. The demographic situation is that not allow expect that these countries become white and Christian at the next decade. Even if right-wing forces come to power in those countries.
An alliance between the nationalist, traditionalist, conservative forces of Europe and representatives of traditional Islam on the other. (eg an alliance between the French nationalists and Islamic traditionalists from Algeria in order to oppose for French-Algerian migration traffic). Such an alliance can build on the principles of the primacy of the European, white and Christian population rights in terms of respect for Muslims.This alliance should be directed against modern liberal regime, who make up the backbone of the so-called cultural Marxism.
Now we can be seen situational alliances of nationalists and muslims. Protests against homodictatorship in France for example, they unite the nationalists, monarchists, traditionalists Catholics on one side and Muslims - on the other. We don't need an alliance with Islamist Salafists (ISIS), of course.
Muslims is an example for Europeans how to protect native traditions today.
Muslims ignore laws that are contrary to their religion. This is their advantage. Christians and Europeans in general should act accordingly because the political and juridical reality of modern Europe is actually anti-Christian and anti-European. Tolerance to destructive processes and phenomena is the road to nowhere. We must consistently defend the truth" - Zahrebelny said.
In light of this problem Zagrebelny recalled a number of Ukrainian problems like the recent statement of "Right Sector" regards Andrukhovych (Ukrainian writer, supporter of "Donbass refusing" ideas), Ukrainian TV channel "Inter" with pro-Russian content or pseudo-Historical documentary on Stepan Bandera on "1+1" channel. "We need to defend our own values" - Zahrebelny says.
Finally, I want to give a few examples of anti-Christian dirt on «Charlie Hebdo» pages and ask why the author of those cartoons was not punished?
The point of no return have passed in the most of European countries. The demographic situation is that not allow expect that these countries become white and Christian at the next decade. Even if right-wing forces come to power in those countries.
An alliance between the nationalist, traditionalist, conservative forces of Europe and representatives of traditional Islam on the other. (eg an alliance between the French nationalists and Islamic traditionalists from Algeria in order to oppose for French-Algerian migration traffic). Such an alliance can build on the principles of the primacy of the European, white and Christian population rights in terms of respect for Muslims.This alliance should be directed against modern liberal regime, who make up the backbone of the so-called cultural Marxism.
Now we can be seen situational alliances of nationalists and muslims. Protests against homodictatorship in France for example, they unite the nationalists, monarchists, traditionalists Catholics on one side and Muslims - on the other. We don't need an alliance with Islamist Salafists (ISIS), of course.
Muslims is an example for Europeans how to protect native traditions today.
Muslims ignore laws that are contrary to their religion. This is their advantage. Christians and Europeans in general should act accordingly because the political and juridical reality of modern Europe is actually anti-Christian and anti-European. Tolerance to destructive processes and phenomena is the road to nowhere. We must consistently defend the truth" - Zahrebelny said.
In light of this problem Zagrebelny recalled a number of Ukrainian problems like the recent statement of "Right Sector" regards Andrukhovych (Ukrainian writer, supporter of "Donbass refusing" ideas), Ukrainian TV channel "Inter" with pro-Russian content or pseudo-Historical documentary on Stepan Bandera on "1+1" channel. "We need to defend our own values" - Zahrebelny says.
Finally, I want to give a few examples of anti-Christian dirt on «Charlie Hebdo» pages and ask why the author of those cartoons was not punished?
Коментарі
Дописати коментар