EUROPE, MIGRANTS AND SHORT SKIRTS

It is possible find some positive aspects in many negative phenomenons, even in today's invasion of migrants to the EU. Here, the positive aspect lies in resonance caused by this phenomenon. The tools of liberal censorship have failed, and, at least, some parts of the European society have shuddered from a painful part that accompanies the process of replacing indigenous Europeans by representatives of other nations.


However, the anti-European forces have made an attempt to refocus the society's attention from real root of the problem in a very clever way. It would seem that the events of New Year's Night in Cologne as well as a number of similar incidents of recent years involving migrants address the Europeans with clear messages, like: "Alarm! MIgration ruins Europe! THis is not even a migration, but a conquest of our lands! We have to defend it! We have to protect our people from dissolution in the multiculturalist swamp!" In contrary, most part of the European media started to promote radically other ideas, such as: "We have to help migrants to learn the European values," or "in this situation we have to protect the women's rights," or even "to overcome the manifestations of xenophobia" (right, against the background of new wave of Asian and African invasion to Europe some people really try to talk about "xenophobia"). In short, instead to put on top the issue of protection the European people they continue to use liberal rhetoric.

Especially revealing was an attempt to drown out the problem by drawing public attention to the issue of "Women's rights." It turns out that the problem lies not in replacement of Europeans in Europe by representatives of non European nations, but in the fact that most part of these non Europeans cast doubt on the legitimacy of women's emancipation, and particularly, their right to wear short skirts. Indeed , in the context of migrants' attacks on women was repeatedly sounded the thesis, that the attacks were provoked first of all by their immodest appearance. The response to this version was lightning fast - it caused a tsunami of talks about the inadmissibility of encroachment on the achievements of women's emancipation.

Is worth saying that special attention to women's sexual integrity it is quite natural phenomenon in the highest sense of this word. Sexual aggression against a woman, who is a member of a particular society is a challenge for all this society. However, in our case it is about something different. The "women's issue" is artificially raised to redirect social indignation about the fact of aggression of one ethnic group against other in a different direction. At the same time the essence of a woman's sexual integrity is significantly distorted.

Let us consider closely the phenomenon of emancipation. Understanding of the norms in women's clothing in terms of the ideas of emancipation is a clear illustration of how worthless are their attempts to negate the traditional norms. The traditional European culture concerning to women's clothes is characterized by a combination of a decent appearance with ability to demonstrate her beauty publicly under the rules of modesty; while in the case of many local Muslim cultures, this opportunity is minimized. In other words, a European woman can demonstrate her beauty, but it is unacceptable to appear in public sphere in a dress, that could cause sexual excitement of a third-party man. Deprived excesses demonstration of beauty plays an important social and communicative function - it encourages other man to be gallant with a woman.

A model, proposed by anti-traditionalists and haters of the European culture is diametrically opposite. On their "progressive" opinion a woman's modesty, that is inherent to traditional European culture has to be replaced by vulgarity and nudity. In addition, their understanding of the nudity appears us in clearly frigid form. From the viewpoint of feminists, no man has the right to be gallant with a woman, he hasn't behave with her like with lady because such behavior is an "expression of sexism." Moreover, currently under the flag of fight with sexism is launched promotion of a cult of total asexuality. This grotesque situation is described very aptly in the mid of 90's by Michel Houellebecq. In the beginning of his novel "Whatever" (also known as "extension of the area of struggle") he describes a corporate party. During the party one girl undress aimlessly to underwear, and then immediately gets dressed. Then two drunken feminist-minded women begin to praise their employee, who came at work in mini-skirt. According to them "she has the right to dress as she wants, and it's not the way to seduce men, she just fill herself comfortable and she just want to likes herself..." 

I repeat, this eclecticism stems from the principle of automatic objection to any aspect of the traditional worldview. the influence of feminist ideology forces women to behave as though they aren't have (shall not have) their natural female beauty, and this applies to both public and intimate spheres of their life  (do not forget that a significant percentage of feminists are lesbians, and this explains a lot).

Thus, in order to obscure the essence of problems, caused by influx of migrants was used not just an informational noise, but clearly devastating messages. Anti-European processes we observe now all over Europe is the result of a series of successive steps aimed to destroy the European society from the inside, been launched over a century ago from planting a seed of destructive ideas in the minds of some social groups. Since 1968 this process became more intense and noticeable. However, rather than recognize the falsity of previously chosen way and concentrate all efforts at search of methods for correction of errors, some Europeans still considering that move towards decay as the best way to solve the existing problem. In addition, today's ethnic troubles in Europe were caused not only by previous spreading of destructive ideas of multiculturalism and cultural-marxism, but also a number of other points, including the society's neglect the Christian principles in sexual life (abortions, or destruction the institute of family, as a result - demographic crisis), as well as systematic pacification and demasculinization of the European society. Instead of attempts to overcome  all aforementioned destructive phenomenons we see only new steps to strengthen them.

Original article by Igor Zagrebelny

Source: Бандерівець